Hillcrest State Bank of University Park v. Evis-Southwest, Inc.

Texas Supreme Court

Hillcrest State Bank of University Park v. Evis-Southwest, Inc.

409 S.W.2d 841, 10 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 98, 1966 Tex. LEXIS 284

Texas Supreme Court·Decided November 9, 1966·No. No. A-11525·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ON APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF ERROR

PER CURIAM.

The application for writ of error is refused, no reversible error. In so doing we neither approve nor disapprove the holding of the Court of Civil Appeals that Article 342-711 of Title 16, Vernon’s Ann.Tex.Civ. [842]*842Stat., gives the depositor a period of one year during which he is under no duty to examine his statements and cancelled checks, and would not be negligent in failing to discover forgeries. The Court of Civil Appeals opinion is reported in 402 S.W.2d 276.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ON APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF ERROR

PER CURIAM.

The application for writ of error is refused, no reversible error. In so doing we neither approve nor disapprove the holding of the Court of Civil Appeals that Article 342-711 of Title 16, Vernon’s Ann.Tex.Civ. [842]*842Stat., gives the depositor a period of one year during which he is under no duty to examine his statements and cancelled checks, and would not be negligent in failing to discover forgeries. The Court of Civil Appeals opinion is reported in 402 S.W.2d 276.

Hillcrest State Bank of University Park v. Evis-Southwest, Inc., 409 S.W.2d 841, 10 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 98, 1966 Tex. LEXIS 284 (Tex. 1966).

Pincite

409 S.W.2d 841 (Hillcrest State Bank of University Park v. Evis-Southwest, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related