Hill Vs. Leiataua

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

THOMAS C. HILL, INDIVIDUALLY, No. 80048 Appellant, vs. SERINA TULILI LEIATAUA, INDIVIDUALLY, Res • ondent. THOMAS C. HILL, INDIVIDUALLY, No. 80101 " Appellant, vs. SERINA TULILI LEIATAUA, FILE INDIVIDUALLY, FEB 2 8 2020 Res • ondent. ELL-7,ALET`i A BROWN CLERK OF SUPREME COURT

ORDER DISMISSING APPEALS DEPUTY CIRic cl

On February 12, 2020, appellant filed a letter1 regarding notice of settlement in these two matters, which we elect to treat as a motion to dismiss these appeals. Cause appearing, the motion is granted, and these appeals are dismissed. NRAP 42(b). It is so ORDERED.

CLERK OF THE SUPREME COURT ELIZABETH A. BROWN

BY 4i4i1A4e-C ' ;/11"41"s1--Y

1 Counsel for appellant is advised that the proper way to communicate with the court is by way of a formal motion, not by way of a letter. See SUPREME COURT OF Weddell v. Stewart, 127 Nev. 645, 652 n.8, 261 P.3d 1080, 1085 n.8 (2011). NEVADA

CLERK'S ORDER

to] 1947 ., 020-08180 cc: Hon. Michael A. Cherry, Senior Justice Hon. Nancy L. Allf, District Judge Ara H. Shirinian, Settlement Judge Bremer Whyte Brown & O'Meara, LLP/Las Vegas Eric Blank Injury Attorneys Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

CLERKS ORDER 2 0.1) (947 •=4ir.