Hill v. Young
This text of 258 A.D. 1035 (Hill v. Young) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment and order reversed on the facts and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event. (See Per Curiam opinion filed in Young v. Rochester Gas & Electric Corp., ante, p. 418, decided herewith.) All concur. (The judgment is for defendants in an automobile negligence action. The order denies a motion for a new trial.) Present — Crosby, P. J., Cunningham, Taylor, Dowling and Harris, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
258 A.D. 1035, 17 N.Y.S.2d 36, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8724, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hill-v-young-nyappdiv-1940.