Hill v. Williams

Eighth Circuit

Hill v. Williams

490 F. App'x 826

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided October 25, 2012·No. No. 12-2425·Published

Opinion

[Unpublished]

PER CURIAM.

Arkansas inmate Jessie Hill appeals the district court’s¹ preservice dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1988 action. Upon our careful de novo review, see Cooper v. Schriro, 189 F.3d 781, 783 (8th Cir.1999) (per curiam) (standard of review), we find no basis for reversal. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[Unpublished]

PER CURIAM.

Arkansas inmate Jessie Hill appeals the district court’s¹ preservice dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1988 action. Upon our careful de novo review, see Cooper v. Schriro, 189 F.3d 781, 783 (8th Cir.1999) (per curiam) (standard of review), we find no basis for reversal. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Footnotes

Hill v. Williams, 490 F. App'x 826 (8th Cir. 2012).

Pincite

490 F. App'x 826 (Hill v. Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Footnotes

Related