Hill v. Westcott
This text of 34 N.Y.S. 1141 (Hill v. Westcott) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
It seems clear that the contract in question herein was a specific contract between Westcott on the one side and Hill and Harrison on the other, wherein Westcott agreed to pay Hill and Harrison 10 cents per can cartage on milk carted by them from their creamery at Sidney to the station at the same place, and shipped over certain specified lines of railroad. The milk was shipped as per this agreement. We are therefore of the opinion that the judgment should be affirmed, with ■costs. All concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
34 N.Y.S. 1141, 96 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 606, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hill-v-westcott-nysupct-1895.