Hill v. Westcott

New York Supreme Court

Hill v. Westcott

68 N.Y. St. Rep. 873

New York Supreme Court·Decided July 26, 1885·Published

Opinion

Pratt, J.

— It seems clear that the contract in question herein was a specific contract between Westcott on the one side and Hill and Harrison on the other wherein Westcott agreed to pay Hill and Harrison ton cents per can cartage on milk carted by them from their creamery at Sidney to the station at the same place, and shipped over certain specified" lines of railroad. The milk was shipped as per this agreement. We are therefore of the opinion that the judgment should be affirmed, with costs. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pratt, J.

— It seems clear that the contract in question herein was a specific contract between Westcott on the one side and Hill and Harrison on the other wherein Westcott agreed to pay Hill and Harrison ton cents per can cartage on milk carted by them from their creamery at Sidney to the station at the same place, and shipped over certain specified" lines of railroad. The milk was shipped as per this agreement. We are therefore of the opinion that the judgment should be affirmed, with costs. All concur.

Hill v. Westcott, 68 N.Y. St. Rep. 873 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1885).

Pincite

68 N.Y. St. Rep. 873 (Hill v. Westcott) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.