Hill v. Urbana
This text of 670 N.E.2d 999 (Hill v. Urbana) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Champaign App. No. 94-CA-22. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Champaign County. Upon consideration of the motion of R.E. Holland Excavating, Inc., to participate in oral argument,
IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion to participate in oral argument be, and hereby is, granted.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that no additional time will be allotted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
670 N.E.2d 999, 77 Ohio St. 3d 1409, 1996 Ohio LEXIS 3984, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hill-v-urbana-ohio-1996.