Hill v. Sweet

Supreme Court of Kansas

Hill v. Sweet

164 P. 1078, 100 Kan. 531, 1917 Kan. LEXIS 367

CourtSupreme Court of Kansas

DecidedMay 12, 1917

DocketNo. 20,842

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 164 P. 1078 (Hill v. Sweet) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hill v. Sweet, 164 P. 1078, 100 Kan. 531, 1917 Kan. LEXIS 367 (kan 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

This is an appeal from an order setting aside a judgment rendered by default upon service by publication, and permitting defendants to answer in the action. It has been repeatedly held that such an order is not one which can be reviewed while the action is still pending in the district court. McCulloch v. Dodge, 8 Kan. 476.; Flint v. Noyes, 27 Kan. 351, 353; List v. Jockheck, 45 Kan. 349, 27 Pac. 184; Shurtleff v. Chase County, 63 Kan. 645, 652, 66 Pac. 654; Vail v. School District, 86 Kan. 808, 811, 122 Pac. 885.

The appeal is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

This is an appeal from an order setting aside a judgment rendered by default upon service by publication, and permitting defendants to answer in the action. It has been repeatedly held that such an order is not one which can be reviewed while the action is still pending in the district court. McCulloch v. Dodge, 8 Kan. 476.; Flint v. Noyes, 27 Kan. 351, 353; List v. Jockheck, 45 Kan. 349, 27 Pac. 184; Shurtleff v. Chase County, 63 Kan. 645, 652, 66 Pac. 654; Vail v. School District, 86 Kan. 808, 811, 122 Pac. 885.

The appeal is dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

164 P. 1078, 100 Kan. 531, 1917 Kan. LEXIS 367, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hill-v-sweet-kan-1917.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack