Hill v. Sweet

164 P. 1078, 100 Kan. 531, 1917 Kan. LEXIS 367
Supreme Court of Kansas·Decided May 12, 1917·No. No. 20,842·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:

This is an appeal from an order setting aside a judgment rendered by default upon service by publication, and permitting defendants to answer in the action. It has been repeatedly held that such an order is not one which can be reviewed while the action is still pending in the district court. McCulloch v. Dodge, 8 Kan. 476.; Flint v. Noyes, 27 Kan. 351, 353; List v. Jockheck, 45 Kan. 349, 27 Pac. 184; Shurtleff v. Chase County, 63 Kan. 645, 652, 66 Pac. 654; Vail v. School District, 86 Kan. 808, 811, 122 Pac. 885.

The appeal is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hill v. Sweet, 164 P. 1078, 100 Kan. 531, 1917 Kan. LEXIS 367 (kan 1917).

164 P. 1078 (Hill v. Sweet) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ambrister v. Donehew
1938 OK 432 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1938)
Shamel v. Wichita Motors Co.
225 P. 1031 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1924)