Hill v. Stone

Supreme Court

Hill v. Stone

416 U.S. 963, 94 S. Ct. 1984

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hill v. Stone. Read the opinion of the Court — 421 U.S. 289 →

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided April 25, 1974·No. No. A-986·Published

Opinion

D. C. N. D. Tex. Application for partial stay, presented to Mr. Justice-Powell, and -by him referred to the Court, granted. It is ordered that the judgment be stayed to the extent that it prohibits the use of dual-box election procedure.. Stay order is to remain in effect pending -timely filing and disposition of an appeal in this Court. If the appeal is timely filed' this stay shall, remain in effect- pending issuance of judgment of "this Court.

The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

D. C. N. D. Tex. Application for partial stay, presented to Mr. Justice-Powell, and -by him referred to the Court, granted. It is ordered that the judgment be stayed to the extent that it prohibits the use of dual-box election procedure.. Stay order is to remain in effect pending -timely filing and disposition of an appeal in this Court. If the appeal is timely filed' this stay shall, remain in effect- pending issuance of judgment of "this Court.

The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.-

Hill v. Stone, 416 U.S. 963, 94 S. Ct. 1984 (1974).

Pincite

416 U.S. 963 (Hill v. Stone) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.