Hill v. Stevens Warehouse Co.
This text of 113 S.E. 813 (Hill v. Stevens Warehouse Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. This being a suit in trover to recover the value of a certain bale of cotton which had been deposited with the defendant and to which the plaintiff claimed title, and the evidence being inconclusive and not demanding the inference that the cotton was at the time of its [111]*111deposit with the defendant, or any time before its conversion by the defendant, the property of the plaintiff, the verdict rendered for the defendant was authorized.
2. The special grounds of the motion for a new trial are without merit.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
113 S.E. 813, 29 Ga. App. 110, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 92, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hill-v-stevens-warehouse-co-gactapp-1922.