Hill v. State
261 S.W.2d 849
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hill v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 158 Tex. Crim. 313 →
Opinion
This is a companion case to that of Roach v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 261 S.W.2d 847, and the same question is raised as to the sufficiency of the indictment, the allegation being that appellant possessed and had in his control a bomb, without further allegation as to the particular type, kind or nature thereof.
Having concluded that such an indictment is fatally defective because of such omission, this conviction cannot stand.
The judgment is reversed and the prosecution ordered dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hill v. State, 261 S.W.2d 849 (Tex. 1953).
261 S.W.2d 849 (Hill v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Roach v. State
261 S.W.2d 847 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1953)