Hill v. State
170 S.W. 149
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hill v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 72 Tex. Crim. 109 →
Opinion
Appellant was convicted of assault with intent to murder; his punishment being assessed at nine years’ confinement in the penitentiary.
The record contains neither bills of exception nor statement of facts. The motions for new trial, both original and amended, are based upon the insufficiency of the evidence to bring the appellant within the allegations of the indictment. The evidence not being before us, we are unable to decide that question.
The judgment must be affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hill v. State, 170 S.W. 149 (Tex. 1914).
170 S.W. 149 (Hill v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.