Hill v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Hill v. State

1926 OK CR 329, 248 P. 1118, 35 Okla. Crim. 98, 1926 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 309

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedSeptember 13, 1926

DocketNo. A-5841.

StatusPublished

This text of 1926 OK CR 329 (Hill v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hill v. State, 1926 OK CR 329, 248 P. 1118, 35 Okla. Crim. 98, 1926 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 309 (Okla. Ct. App. 1926).

Pincite

Opinion

*99 PER CURIAM.

On August 6, 1926, the Attorney General filed his motion in this cause to dismiss the appeal, supported by a showing that the plaintiff in error had voluntarily placed himself without leave beyond the jurisdiction of this court, with the avowed intention of remaining beyond the reach of its process. The record further shows that counsel for plaintiff in error has been notified of such motion and has made no response. For good cause shown the appeal is accordingly dismissed, with direction to the trial court to issue process to enforce the original judgment therein rendered in case the plaintiff in error can be hereafter apprehended.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*99 PER CURIAM.

On August 6, 1926, the Attorney General filed his motion in this cause to dismiss the appeal, supported by a showing that the plaintiff in error had voluntarily placed himself without leave beyond the jurisdiction of this court, with the avowed intention of remaining beyond the reach of its process. The record further shows that counsel for plaintiff in error has been notified of such motion and has made no response. For good cause shown the appeal is accordingly dismissed, with direction to the trial court to issue process to enforce the original judgment therein rendered in case the plaintiff in error can be hereafter apprehended.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1926 OK CR 329, 248 P. 1118, 35 Okla. Crim. 98, 1926 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 309, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hill-v-state-oklacrimapp-1926.