Hill v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Hill v. State

1918 OK CR 203, 175 P. 200, 15 Okla. Crim. 668, 1918 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 25

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedNovember 13, 1918

DocketNo. A-3014.

StatusPublished

This text of 1918 OK CR 203 (Hill v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hill v. State, 1918 OK CR 203, 175 P. 200, 15 Okla. Crim. 668, 1918 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 25 (Okla. Ct. App. 1918).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error, Lem Hill, was convicted in the county court of Canadian county on an information charging assault and battery, in that he did assault, strike, beat and bruise one W. R. Forster with a club, and in accordance with the verdict of the jury was sentenced to be confined in the county jail for thirty days, and to pay a fine of $40 and the costs, and, in default of the payment of said fine and costs, that he be further confined in the county jail or at work on the public roads in satisfaction of the same as by law provided. From the judgment he appealed, by filing in this court on May 24, 1917, petition in error with case-made.

No brief has been filed, nor oral argument made, in behalf of the plaintiff in error, when the ease was submitted on the record. An examination of the same shows that there are no errors which would authorize a reversal of the judgment.

The judgment herein is therefore affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error, Lem Hill, was convicted in the county court of Canadian county on an information charging assault and battery, in that he did assault, strike, beat and bruise one W. R. Forster with a club, and in accordance with the verdict of the jury was sentenced to be confined in the county jail for thirty days, and to pay a fine of $40 and the costs, and, in default of the payment of said fine and costs, that he be further confined in the county jail or at work on the public roads in satisfaction of the same as by law provided. From the judgment he appealed, by filing in this court on May 24, 1917, petition in error with case-made.

No brief has been filed, nor oral argument made, in behalf of the plaintiff in error, when the ease was submitted on the record. An examination of the same shows that there are no errors which would authorize a reversal of the judgment.

The judgment herein is therefore affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1918 OK CR 203, 175 P. 200, 15 Okla. Crim. 668, 1918 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 25, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hill-v-state-oklacrimapp-1918.