Hill v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Hill v. State

1914 OK CR 183, 142 P. 1198, 11 Okla. Crim. 670, 1914 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 77

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedSeptember 19, 1914

DocketNo. A-2088.

StatusPublished

This text of 1914 OK CR 183 (Hill v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hill v. State, 1914 OK CR 183, 142 P. 1198, 11 Okla. Crim. 670, 1914 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 77 (Okla. Ct. App. 1914).

Pincite

Opinion

PEE CUEIAM.

Plaintiff in error, Jack Hill, was convicted at the July, 1913, term of the county court of Love county on a charge of unlawfully conveying intoxicating liquor from one place in Love county to another, place therein, and his punishment fixed at a fine of fifty dollars and imprisonment in the county jail for a period of thirty days. The appeal was filed in this court on the 13th day of September, 1913. No briefs have been filed on behalf of plaintiff in error and no appearance made for oral argument. The Attorney General filed a motion to affirm the judgment of the trial court for failure to prosecute. No fundamental error is assigned in the petition in error. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PEE CUEIAM.

Plaintiff in error, Jack Hill, was convicted at the July, 1913, term of the county court of Love county on a charge of unlawfully conveying intoxicating liquor from one place in Love county to another, place therein, and his punishment fixed at a fine of fifty dollars and imprisonment in the county jail for a period of thirty days. The appeal was filed in this court on the 13th day of September, 1913. No briefs have been filed on behalf of plaintiff in error and no appearance made for oral argument. The Attorney General filed a motion to affirm the judgment of the trial court for failure to prosecute. No fundamental error is assigned in the petition in error. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1914 OK CR 183, 142 P. 1198, 11 Okla. Crim. 670, 1914 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 77, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hill-v-state-oklacrimapp-1914.