Hill v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Hill v. State

147 P. 1198, 11 Okla. Crim. 721

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma·Decided January 1, 1900·No. No. A-2216.·Published

Opinion

PEE CUEIAM.

Plaintiff in error, Pred Hill, was convicted of the offense of conveying intoxicating liquor, and his punishment fixed at a fine of fifty dollars and thirty days confinement in the county jail. January 7, 1914, judgment was rendered in pursuance of the verdict. An appeal was taken from the judgment. No bñef has been filed, and when the case was called for final submission no appearance was made on behalf of plaintiff in error. Whereupon the state moved to affirm the judgment for failure to prosecute the appeal. The motion to affirm is sustained and the judgment herein is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PEE CUEIAM.

Plaintiff in error, Pred Hill, was convicted of the offense of conveying intoxicating liquor, and his punishment fixed at a fine of fifty dollars and thirty days confinement in the county jail. January 7, 1914, judgment was rendered in pursuance of the verdict. An appeal was taken from the judgment. No bñef has been filed, and when the case was called for final submission no appearance was made on behalf of plaintiff in error. Whereupon the state moved to affirm the judgment for failure to prosecute the appeal. The motion to affirm is sustained and the judgment herein is affirmed.

Hill v. State, 147 P. 1198, 11 Okla. Crim. 721 (Okla. Ct. App. 1900).

Pincite

147 P. 1198 (Hill v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.