Hill v. State of Florida

Supreme Court of Florida

Hill v. State of Florida

28 So. 2d 114, 158 Fla. 162, 1946 Fla. LEXIS 505

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided November 26, 1946·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This appellant was convicted under an indictment charging the receiving and concealing of certain stolen property, knowing the same to have been stolen, which offense is defined in Section 811.16, F.S.A. After a careful consideration of the evidence produced upon the trial, we have reached the conclusion that the evidence was insufficient to sustain the verdict.

Judgment of conviction reversed.

CHAPMAN, C. J., BROWN and THOMAS, JJ., and BARNS, Circuit Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

This appellant was convicted under an indictment charging the receiving and concealing of certain stolen property, knowing the same to have been stolen, which offense is defined in Section 811.16, F.S.A. After a careful consideration of the evidence produced upon the trial, we have reached the conclusion that the evidence was insufficient to sustain the verdict.

Judgment of conviction reversed.

CHAPMAN, C. J., BROWN and THOMAS, JJ., and BARNS, Circuit Judge, concur.

Hill v. State of Florida, 28 So. 2d 114, 158 Fla. 162, 1946 Fla. LEXIS 505 (Fla. 1946).

Pincite

28 So. 2d 114 (Hill v. State of Florida) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.