Hill v. State
387 S.W.3d 406, 2012 WL 6139004, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1558
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hill v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 5 →
Opinion
ORDER
Michael Hill (“Movant”) appeals from the motion court’s denial of his Rule 24.035 motion seeking to vacate his guilty plea and sentence for trafficking in the second degree, in violation of Section 195.223, RSMo Cum.Supp.2001, based on his plea counsel’s ineffectiveness.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. The judgment dismissing Movant’s motion is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hill v. State, 387 S.W.3d 406, 2012 WL 6139004, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1558 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).
387 S.W.3d 406 (Hill v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.