Hill v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Hill v. State

823 S.W.2d 26, 1991 Mo. App. LEXIS 1566, 1991 WL 206821

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hill v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1990 Mo. App. LEXIS 183 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 15, 1991·No. No. 59748·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Ricky Hill, appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion without an evi-dentiary hearing. We have reviewed the record and the briefs of the parties and have determined that the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the motion court are not clearly erroneous. As we also find that no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a full opinion, we affirm the denial of appellant’s Rule 24.035 motion pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). A memorandum, solely for the use of the parties here involved, has been supplied explaining the reasons for our holding.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Ricky Hill, appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion without an evi-dentiary hearing. We have reviewed the record and the briefs of the parties and have determined that the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the motion court are not clearly erroneous. As we also find that no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a full opinion, we affirm the denial of appellant’s Rule 24.035 motion pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). A memorandum, solely for the use of the parties here involved, has been supplied explaining the reasons for our holding.

Hill v. State, 823 S.W.2d 26, 1991 Mo. App. LEXIS 1566, 1991 WL 206821 (Mo. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

823 S.W.2d 26 (Hill v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.