Hill v. State

162 S.E. 158, 44 Ga. App. 569, 1932 Ga. App. LEXIS 381
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJanuary 12, 1932
Docket21950
StatusPublished

This text of 162 S.E. 158 (Hill v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hill v. State, 162 S.E. 158, 44 Ga. App. 569, 1932 Ga. App. LEXIS 381 (Ga. Ct. App. 1932).

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

1. The eleven excerpts from the charge of the court, complained of in the motion for a new trial, when considered in the light of the entire charge and of the facts of the case, disclose no reversible error.

[570]*570Decided January 12, 1932. Hugh B. Combs, for plaintiff in error. M. L. Felts, solicitor-general, contra.

2. While some parts of the evidence amply authorized the defendant’s acquittal, other parts authorized the verdict of voluntary manslaughter, and, the finding of the jury having been approved by the trial judge, and no reversible error of law appearing to have been committed on the trial, this court is without authority to interfere.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke, J., concurs. Bloodworth, J., absent on account of illness.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
162 S.E. 158, 44 Ga. App. 569, 1932 Ga. App. LEXIS 381, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hill-v-state-gactapp-1932.