Hill v. State
This text of 78 S.E. 1013 (Hill v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. The objection made to an excerpt from the charge of the court, on the ground that it was an expression of opinion as to what had been proved by the State, is not well founded. The trial judge fully and fairly stated the contentions of both the. State and the accused, without the slightest intimation or expression of opinion as to which contentions had been established by the evidence.
2. No other error of law was complained of, and the verdict is supported by the evidence. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
78 S.E. 1013, 13 Ga. App. 170, 1913 Ga. App. LEXIS 86, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hill-v-state-gactapp-1913.