Hill v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Hill v. State

78 S.E. 1013, 13 Ga. App. 170, 1913 Ga. App. LEXIS 86

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hill v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 18 Ga. App. 259 →

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided August 11, 1913·No. 4990·Published

Opinion

Hill, C. J.

1. The objection made to an excerpt from the charge of the court, on the ground that it was an expression of opinion as to what had been proved by the State, is not well founded. The trial judge fully and fairly stated the contentions of both the. State and the accused, without the slightest intimation or expression of opinion as to which contentions had been established by the evidence.

2. No other error of law was complained of, and the verdict is supported by the evidence. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hill, C. J.

1. The objection made to an excerpt from the charge of the court, on the ground that it was an expression of opinion as to what had been proved by the State, is not well founded. The trial judge fully and fairly stated the contentions of both the. State and the accused, without the slightest intimation or expression of opinion as to which contentions had been established by the evidence.

2. No other error of law was complained of, and the verdict is supported by the evidence. Judgment affirmed.

Hill v. State, 78 S.E. 1013, 13 Ga. App. 170, 1913 Ga. App. LEXIS 86 (Ga. Ct. App. 1913).

Pincite

78 S.E. 1013 (Hill v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.