Home/Supreme Court of Georgia/Hill v. State

Hill v. State

37 S.E. 441, 112 Ga. 32, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 17
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedOctober 27, 1900
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 37 S.E. 441 (Hill v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hill v. State, 37 S.E. 441, 112 Ga. 32, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 17 (Ga. 1900).

Opinion

Fish, J.

1. A motion for a new trial in a criminal case, based on the general grounds that the verdict complained of was contrary to law and evidence, does not raise any question as to the constitutionality of an act of the General Assembly. S., F. & W. Ry. Co. v. Hardin, 110 Ga. 433.

2. When a motion for a new trial fails to make special assignments of error, the same can not be supplied in a bill of exceptions alleging error in overruling such motion. Clay v. Smith, 108 Ga. 189; Newman v. Day, Id. 813.

3. The evidence not only warranted but demanded the verdict.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Packer Corporation
2 P.2d 114 (Utah Supreme Court, 1931)
Hubbard v. Bibb Brokerage Co.
160 S.E. 639 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1931)
State v. Glass
151 N.W. 229 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1915)
Crawford v. Wilson
83 S.E. 667 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1914)
Kelly v. Strouse & Bros.
43 S.E. 280 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1903)
Phœnix Insurance v. Schwartz
57 L.R.A. 752 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1902)
White v. Screven County
38 S.E. 89 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1901)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
37 S.E. 441, 112 Ga. 32, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 17, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hill-v-state-ga-1900.