Hill v. State

821 So. 2d 1173, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 10297, 2002 WL 1625418
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 24, 2002·No. No. 2D02-1563·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the order denying Troy A. Hill’s motion to correct an illegal sentence without prejudice to his right to file a timely motion pursuant to Florida Rule of [1174]*1174Criminal Procedure 3.850. See Blake v. State, 807 So.2d 772 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002).

ALTENBERND, NORTHCUTT and SALCINES, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hill v. State, 821 So. 2d 1173, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 10297, 2002 WL 1625418 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

821 So. 2d 1173 (Hill v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Edmondson v. State
854 So. 2d 751 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)