Hill v. State
642 So. 2d 1206, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 9561, 1994 WL 540679
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hill v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 596 So. 2d 1210 →
Opinion
Appellant’s first conviction of direct criminal contempt is AFFIRMED, but his second conviction is REVERSED because the trial court failed to strictly comply with the procedural requirements of Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.830. See Hernandez v. State, 397 So.2d 715 (Fla. 1st DCA), rev. denied, 411 So.2d 382 (Fla.1981). See also O’Neal v. State, 501 So.2d 98 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hill v. State, 642 So. 2d 1206, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 9561, 1994 WL 540679 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).
642 So. 2d 1206 (Hill v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
O'NEAL v. State
501 So. 2d 98 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
Hernandez v. State
397 So. 2d 715 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)