Hill v. State

468 So. 2d 406, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1028, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13624
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 24, 1985
DocketNo. 84-1704
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 468 So. 2d 406 (Hill v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hill v. State, 468 So. 2d 406, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1028, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13624 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s conviction but vacate his sentence and remand this cause for resentencing with directions that any re-sentencing be in accord with the sentencing guidelines or that separate written findings be entered if the sentence deviates from the guidelines. See Boynton v. State, 10 F.L.W. 795 (Fla. 4th DCA Mar. 27, 1985). The trial court is also cautioned that it is not proper to retain jurisdiction over a sentence imposed pursuant to the guidelines. See Hawkins v. State, 463 So.2d 480 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985); Knight v. State, 455 So.2d 457 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984).

ANSTEAD, C.J., and GLICKSTEIN and WALDEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Hill
492 So. 2d 1072 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
468 So. 2d 406, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1028, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13624, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hill-v-state-fladistctapp-1985.