Hill v. State
This text of 468 So. 2d 406 (Hill v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We affirm appellant’s conviction but vacate his sentence and remand this cause for resentencing with directions that any re-sentencing be in accord with the sentencing guidelines or that separate written findings be entered if the sentence deviates from the guidelines. See Boynton v. State, 10 F.L.W. 795 (Fla. 4th DCA Mar. 27, 1985). The trial court is also cautioned that it is not proper to retain jurisdiction over a sentence imposed pursuant to the guidelines. See Hawkins v. State, 463 So.2d 480 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985); Knight v. State, 455 So.2d 457 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
468 So. 2d 406, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1028, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13624, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hill-v-state-fladistctapp-1985.