Hill v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Hill v. State

153 So. 921, 26 Ala. App. 649

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 6, 1934

Docket8 Div. 740.

StatusPublished

This text of 153 So. 921 (Hill v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hill v. State, 153 So. 921, 26 Ala. App. 649 (Ala. Ct. App. 1934).

Pincite

Opinion

SAMFORD, Judge.

The only question of merit in this ease is the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the verdict.

There are facts and circumstances in the case tending to discredit the testimony of the three state’s witnesses,, but, if their testimony is believed beyond a reasonable doubt, then this defendant, at the time and place testified to, had in his possession prohibited liquor contrary to law. This was a question for the jury, and the court so held.

Exceptions reserved to remarks of the solicitor in his closing argument are without merit.

We find no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI