Hill v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Hill v. State

146 So. 920, 25 Ala. App. 640

Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided March 21, 1933·No. 8 Div. 763.·Published

Opinion

SAMFORD, Judge.

Affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

Pending this appeal in this court, the lower court granted defendant’s motion for a new trial in that court. The foregoing fact having been here sufficiently and legally shown, the order of affirmance in said case, made and entered by this court on February 7, 1933, is hereby set aside and held for naught. The cause is remanded to the lower court from which this appeal was taken.

Cause remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SAMFORD, Judge.

Affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

Pending this appeal in this court, the lower court granted defendant’s motion for a new trial in that court. The foregoing fact having been here sufficiently and legally shown, the order of affirmance in said case, made and entered by this court on February 7, 1933, is hereby set aside and held for naught. The cause is remanded to the lower court from which this appeal was taken.

Cause remanded.

Hill v. State, 146 So. 920, 25 Ala. App. 640 (Ala. Ct. App. 1933).

Pincite

146 So. 920 (Hill v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.