Hill v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Hill v. State

146 So. 920, 25 Ala. App. 640

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 21, 1933

Docket8 Div. 763.

StatusPublished

This text of 146 So. 920 (Hill v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hill v. State, 146 So. 920, 25 Ala. App. 640 (Ala. Ct. App. 1933).

Pincite

Opinion

SAMFORD, Judge.

Affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

Pending this appeal in this court, the lower court granted defendant’s motion for a new trial in that court. The foregoing fact having been here sufficiently and legally shown, the order of affirmance in said case, made and entered by this court on February 7, 1933, is hereby set aside and held for naught. The cause is remanded to the lower court from which this appeal was taken.

Cause remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SAMFORD, Judge.

Affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

Pending this appeal in this court, the lower court granted defendant’s motion for a new trial in that court. The foregoing fact having been here sufficiently and legally shown, the order of affirmance in said case, made and entered by this court on February 7, 1933, is hereby set aside and held for naught. The cause is remanded to the lower court from which this appeal was taken.

Cause remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

146 So. 920, 25 Ala. App. 640, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hill-v-state-alactapp-1933.