Hill v. State

129 So. 299, 23 Ala. App. 547, 1930 Ala. App. LEXIS 153
Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided June 17, 1930·No. 8 Div. 15.·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

RIGE, J.

There is in the transcript no record of any warrant of arrest, issued for appellant; no record of any trial, or conviction, in the county court, where the prosecution purports to have originated; no record of an appeal bond from the county court to the circuit court; in fact nothing to show that the circuit court acquired jurisdiction of the person of appellant. The ‘‘judgment entry,” contained in the record, indicates that she was tried under an indictment, but th,ere is no indictment in the record. For all these reasons the judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded. Hawkins v. State, 20 Ala. App. 285, 101 So. 514.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hill v. State, 129 So. 299, 23 Ala. App. 547, 1930 Ala. App. LEXIS 153 (Ala. Ct. App. 1930).

129 So. 299 (Hill v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

James v. State
181 So. 709 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1938)
Warren v. State
129 So. 299 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1930)