Hill v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Hill v. State

557 So. 2d 842, 1990 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 37, 1990 WL 21377

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

DecidedFebruary 2, 1990

Docket6 Div. 695

StatusPublished

This text of 557 So. 2d 842 (Hill v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hill v. State, 557 So. 2d 842, 1990 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 37, 1990 WL 21377 (Ala. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

ON REMAND FROM THE ALABAMA SUPREME COURT

PATTERSON, Judge.

Pursuant to the decision of the Alabama Supreme Court in Ex parte Hill, 557 So.2d 838 (Ala.1989), holding that Hill’s inculpato-ry statement was not voluntary and that its admission into evidence at trial deprived him of a fair trial, the judgment of the circuit court is reversed, and this case is remanded for further proceedings.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

All Judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI