Hill v. State

239 So. 2d 910, 46 Ala. App. 239, 1970 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 412
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hill v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 48 Ala. App. 240
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama·Decided October 6, 1970·No. 7 Div. 34·Published

Opinion

CATES, Judge.

Voluntary manslaughter: ten years.

I

Hill testified in his own behalf. He did not bring any proof as to his good repute.

The State called a rebuttal witness who, over objection, was allowed to testify that Hill enjoyed a bad reputation for turbulence and violence in the community. The court’s ruling was error. Bedsole v. State, 274 Ala. 603, 150 So.2d 696; Pugh v. State, 42 Ala.App. 499, 169 So.2d 27; Sorrells v. State, 44 Ala.App. 481, 213 So.2d 687.

II

There was no error in denying Hill’s complaint about a delay in trial. He had been in the State hospital at Mt. Vernon for an extended period. See Autrey v. State, 44 Ala.App. 53, 202 So.2d 88, special concurrence at p. 61.

III

A continuance was denied Hill to take the deposition of a State physician, Jaime E. Condom, who apparently was vacationing at the time of arraignment.

In view of another trial there should be ample time from the deliverance of this opinion for the preparation of either a written or oral deposition of this witness.

For the error pointed the judgment below is reversed and the cause remanded for trial de novo.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hill v. State, 239 So. 2d 910, 46 Ala. App. 239, 1970 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 412 (Ala. Ct. App. 1970).

239 So. 2d 910 (Hill v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pugh v. State
169 So. 2d 27 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1964)
Autrey v. State
202 So. 2d 88 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1967)
Bedsole v. State
150 So. 2d 696 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1963)
Sorrells v. State
213 So. 2d 687 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1968)