Hill v. State
This text of 89 So. 2d 173 (Hill v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The appellant was convicted of robbery and given a sentence of twenty-five years in the penitentiary, from which he has brought this appeal. The case is submitted on appellee’s motion to strike the transcript of the record and on the merits.
It is unnecessary to consider the motion to strike inasmuch as the appeal is on the record proper and no error is made to appear. The transcript is in all respects regular and the sentence of the court duly imposed in response to the jury’s verdict, the punishment being within the limits prescribed by law for such offense. The judgment is, therefore, due to be affirmed. So ordered.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
89 So. 2d 173, 264 Ala. 636, 1956 Ala. LEXIS 440, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hill-v-state-ala-1956.