Hill v. State
187 So. 873, 237 Ala. 539, 1939 Ala. LEXIS 259
Opinion
The petition seeks to review the Court of Appeals on a conclusion of fact and the application of the law thereto.
As repeatedly ruled, this is beyond the limit of review by the common-law writ of certiorari. Postal Tel.-Cable Co. v. Minderhout, 195 Ala. 420, 71 So. 91.
The writ is therefore denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hill v. State, 187 So. 873, 237 Ala. 539, 1939 Ala. LEXIS 259 (Ala. 1939).
187 So. 873 (Hill v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Eclipse Medical, Inc. v. American Hydro-Surgical Instruments, Inc.
262 F. Supp. 2d 1334 (S.D. Florida, 1999)
Clayton v. Ragsdale
161 So. 2d 804 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1964)