Hill v. Standard Telephone Manufacturing Co.
48 A. 432, 198 Pa. 446, 1901 Pa. LEXIS 817
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided February 25, 1901·No. Appeal, No. 254·Published·Cited by 4 cases
Opinion
We are not convinced of error in the conclusions arrived at by the court below. It follows that the decree based on the conclusions must be affirmed and the specifications of error dismissed.
Decree affirmed and appeal dismissed at the cost of the appellants.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hill v. Standard Telephone Manufacturing Co., 48 A. 432, 198 Pa. 446, 1901 Pa. LEXIS 817 (Pa. 1901).
48 A. 432 (Hill v. Standard Telephone Manufacturing Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Miller v. Parker (In Re Reading Broadcasting, Inc.)
390 B.R. 532 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 2008)
In Re Total Containment, Inc.
335 B.R. 589 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 2005)
Robar Development Corp. v. Minutello
408 A.2d 851 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1979)
Taylor v. Penrose Motor Co.
12 Pa. D. & C. 384 (Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas, 1929)