Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Hill v. Sonwill Distributors, Inc.

Hill v. Sonwill Distributors, Inc.

202 A.D.2d 1057, 610 N.Y.S.2d 927, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3506
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 11, 1994
StatusPublished

This text of 202 A.D.2d 1057 (Hill v. Sonwill Distributors, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hill v. Sonwill Distributors, Inc., 202 A.D.2d 1057, 610 N.Y.S.2d 927, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3506 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Opinion

Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly concluded that factual issues exist concerning plaintiff’s status as a special employee that preclude a grant of summary judgment to defendant (see, O’Brien v Garden Way Mfg., 72 AD2d 860; Hill v Erdle Perforating Co., 53 AD2d 1008). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Niagara County, Rath, Jr., J. — Summary Judgment.) Present —Denman, P. J., Green, Fallon, Callahan and Doerr, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hill v. Erdle Perforating Co.
53 A.D.2d 1008 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)
O'Brien v. Garden Way Manufacturing, Inc.
72 A.D.2d 860 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1979)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
202 A.D.2d 1057, 610 N.Y.S.2d 927, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3506, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hill-v-sonwill-distributors-inc-nyappdiv-1994.