Hill v. Six Flags Over Georgia, Inc.
This text of 282 S.E.2d 224 (Hill v. Six Flags Over Georgia, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The Supreme Court, after granting certiorari in this case, has determined in its review that the. plaintiff was, as a matter of law, a borrowed servant of Six Flags Over Georgia, Inc. That court then held that the Workers’ Compensation Act barred the plaintiff from suing Six Flags in tort for an on-the-job injury. See Six Flags Over Ga. v. Hill, 247 Ga. 375 (276 SE2d 572).
Accordingly, our opinion and judgment in Hill v. Six Flags Over Ga., 155 Ga. App. 457 (270 SE2d 914), reversing the trial court is vacated and set aside, and the opinion of the Supreme Court, affirming the judgment of the trial court, is made the judgment of this [659]*659court.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
282 S.E.2d 224, 158 Ga. App. 658, 1981 Ga. App. LEXIS 2357, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hill-v-six-flags-over-georgia-inc-gactapp-1981.