Hill v. Simms

418 F. App'x 184
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 18, 2011·No. No. 10-7547·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Shawn Wayne Hill appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hill v. Simms, No. 3:07-cv-00349, 2010 WL 3852039 (S.D.W.Va. Sept. 30, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hill v. Simms, 418 F. App'x 184 (4th Cir. 2011).

418 F. App'x 184 (Hill v. Simms) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Screening
28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)