Hill v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

CourtUnited States Court of Federal Claims
DecidedApril 9, 2024
Docket22-0785V
StatusUnpublished

This text of Hill v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (Hill v. Secretary of Health and Human Services) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Federal Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hill v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, (uscfc 2024).

Opinion

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 22-785V

JANELLE HILL, Chief Special Master Corcoran

Petitioner, Filed: March 6, 2024 v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent.

Jerome A. Konkel, Samster, Konkel & Safran, Wauwatosa, WI, for Petitioner.

Nina Ren, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

DECISION ON JOINT STIPULATION 1

On July 20, 2022, Janelle Hill filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq. 2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a right shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”), a Table injury, resulting from an influenza (“flu”) vaccine she received on October 5, 2021. Pet. at 1, ECF No. 1. Petitioner further alleges that the vaccine was administered in the United States, she experienced the residual effects of her condition for more than six months, and there has been no prior award or settlement of a civil action for damages on Petitioner’s behalf as a result of her condition. Id. at 1, 5- 6. Respondent denies “that [P]etitioner sustained a SIRVA Table injury; denies that the flu vaccine caused [P]etitioner’s alleged SIRVA, or any other injury; and denies that [P]etitioner’s current condition is a sequelae of a vaccine-related injury.” Stipulation at 2, ECF No. 26.

1 Because this Decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action taken in this case, it must be made

publicly accessible and will be posted on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, and/or at https://www.govinfo.gov/app/collection/uscourts/national/cofc, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2018) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the Decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access. 2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease

of citation, all section references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2018). Nevertheless, on March 5, 2024, the parties filed the attached joint stipulation, stating that a decision should be entered awarding compensation. I find the stipulation reasonable and adopt it as my decision awarding damages, on the terms set forth therein.

Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached stipulation, I award the following compensation:

a. A lump sum of $29,500.00 in the form of a check payable to Petitioner;

b. A lump sum of $71.50 representing reimbursement of a Medicaid lien for services rendered to Petitioner by the State of Wisconsin, in the form of a check payable jointly to Petitioner and the State of Wisconsin Department of Health Services:

Wisconsin Casualty Recovery 5615 High Point Drive Suite 100 Irving, TX 75038-9984 Case Number: 263374

Petitioner has agreed to endorse this check to the State of Wisconsin Department of Health Services; and

c. A lump sum of $504.44 3 representing reimbursement of a Medicaid lien for services rendered to Petitioner by the State of Wisconsin, in the form of a check payable jointly to Petitioner and Quartz c/o MultiPlan, Inc.:

MultiPlan 535 E. Diehl Road, Suite 100 Naperville, IL 60563 Case Number: 158457

Petitioner has agreed to endorse this check to the MultiPlan.

See Stipulation at 2-3. This amount represents compensation for all items of damages that would be available under Section 15(a). Id.

I approve the requested amount for Petitioner’s compensation. In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this Decision. 4

3 The amounts listed in (b) and (c) represent full satisfaction of any right of subrogation, assignment, claim,

lien, or cause of action the State of Wisconsin may have against any individual as a result of any Medicaid payments the State of Wisconsin has made to or on behalf of Petitioner as a result of Petitioner's alleged injury relating to a vaccine administered on October 5, 2021, under Title XIX of the Social Security Act, see 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(g), (h).

4 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice

renouncing the right to seek review.

2 IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Brian H. Corcoran Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master

3 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

) JANELLE HILL, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) No. 22-785V V. ) Chief Special Master Corcoran ) ECF SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN ) SERVICES, ) ) Respondent. )

STIPULATION

The parties hereby stipulate to the following matters:

1. Janelle Hill ("Petitioner") filed a petition for vaccine compensation under the National

Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-10 to 34 (the "Vaccine Program").

The petition seeks compensation for injuries allegedly related to petitioner's receipt of an

influenza ("flu") vaccine, which vaccine is contained in the Vaccine Injury Table (the "Table"),

42 C.F.R. § 100.3(a).

2. Petitioner received a flu vaccine on October 5, 2021 .

3. The vaccine was administered within the United States.

4. Petitioner alleges that petitioner sustained a shoulder injury related to vaccine

administration ("SIRVA") within the time period set forth in the Table. Petitioner further alleges

that petitioner suffered the residual effects of the alleged injuries for more than six months.

5. Petitioner represents that there has been no prior award or settlement of a civil action

for damages on petitioner's behalf as a result of the alleged injuries. 6. Respondent denies that petitioner sustained a SIRVA Table injury; denies that the flu

vaccine caused petitioner's alleged SIRVA, or any other injury; and denies that petitioner's

current condition is a sequelae of a vaccine-related injury.

7. Maintaining their above-stated positions, the parties nevertheless now agree that the

issues between them shall be settled and that a decision should be entered awarding the

compensation described in paragraph 8 of this Stipulation.

8. As soon as practicable after an entry of judgment reflecting a decision consistent with

the terms of this Stipulation, and after petitioner has filed an election to receive compensation

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-21(a)(l), the Secretary of Health and Human Services will issue

the following vaccine compensation payments for all damages that would be available under 42

U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a):

a.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 300aa
42 U.S.C. § 300aa
§ 300aa-10
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10
§ 300aa-15
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(g)
§ 300aa-21
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-21(a)(l)
Purposes
44 U.S.C. § 3501
§ 300a
42 U.S.C. § 300a

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Hill v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hill-v-secretary-of-health-and-human-services-uscfc-2024.