Hill v. . Power Co.

2 S.E.2d 857, 215 N.C. 797, 1939 N.C. LEXIS 381
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedMay 31, 1939
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 2 S.E.2d 857 (Hill v. . Power Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hill v. . Power Co., 2 S.E.2d 857, 215 N.C. 797, 1939 N.C. LEXIS 381 (N.C. 1939).

Opinion

Civil action by passenger on bus to recover damages for an alleged assault by defendant's driver.

The jury answered the issue of liability in favor of the defendant.

From judgment on the verdict, the plaintiff appeals, assigning as error the failure of the court to comply with C. S., 564, in charging the jury on the law of the case. On a controverted issue of fact, the jury has responded in favor of the defendant. The record is free from reversible error.

The exception to the charge is not well taken. Rooks v. Bruce,213 N.C. 58, 195 S.E. 26. It is not sustained.

The verdict and judgment will be upheld.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Hendrick
61 S.E.2d 349 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1950)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 S.E.2d 857, 215 N.C. 797, 1939 N.C. LEXIS 381, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hill-v-power-co-nc-1939.