Hill v. New York City Housing Authority
This text of 186 A.D.2d 380 (Hill v. New York City Housing Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Alan J. Saks, J.), entered January 2, 1992, which denied defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
A question of fact exists as to whether defendant was, or should have been, aware of the alleged dangerous condition of the stairway where plaintiff fell and injured herself (see, Negri v Stop & Shop, 65 NY2d 625). Indeed, defendant’s own employee testified that the stairs were inspected twice a day at the time of the incident. Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Milonas, Kupferman and Rubin, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
186 A.D.2d 380, 588 N.Y.S.2d 277, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11173, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hill-v-new-york-city-housing-authority-nyappdiv-1992.