Hill v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance
This text of 474 F. App'x 391 (Hill v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Jewel D. Hill appeals the district court’s orders dismissing without prejudice her civil suit for damages relating to an automobile accident and denying her motions to certify constitutional questions to the United States and Virginia Attorneys General and for judicial recusal. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hill v. Nationwide Mutual Ins. Co., No. 3:12-cv-00130-HEH (E.D. Va. Feb. 23 & Feb. 24, 2012). We deny Hill’s motions for a transcript at Government expense and to certify questions to the United States and Virginia Attorneys General. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
474 F. App'x 391, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hill-v-nationwide-mutual-insurance-ca4-2012.