Hill v. National Trust Co.

1 Ga. L. Rep. 25
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJuly 1, 1885
StatusPublished

This text of 1 Ga. L. Rep. 25 (Hill v. National Trust Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hill v. National Trust Co., 1 Ga. L. Rep. 25 (Ga. 1885).

Opinion

Where a bank either expressly or tactily permits an employee to' certify checks drawn upon it, it will be liable for the amount of a check so certified in the. hands of a bona fide holder. Where the bank has limited the authority of the employee to certify checks to cases in- which, the drawer has funds in bank, and the employee negligently or, fraudulently certifies a check when the funds called for-by it do not exist, the bank, and not the innocent bona fide holder of the check, must bear the loss. Testimony that checks certified by a certain employee of a bank have frequently passed through the clearing house, and have been honored by the bank, is evidence of such authority on the part of the employee to certify checks as will bind the bank. — Reporter, June 8, 1885,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Ga. L. Rep. 25, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hill-v-national-trust-co-ga-1885.