Hill v. Morgan Power Apparatus Corp.

368 F.2d 230
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedNovember 22, 1966
DocketNos. 18357, 18358
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 368 F.2d 230 (Hill v. Morgan Power Apparatus Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hill v. Morgan Power Apparatus Corp., 368 F.2d 230 (8th Cir. 1966).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff-appellant, a citizen of Arkansas, was injured on October 24, 1964, in an accident in Arkansas while using a defective swivel manufactured by defendant-appellee, a Washington corporation. Two separate actions were commenced by plaintiff-appellant, one in warranty and one in tort, alleging that the swivel was defective and was the cause of plaintiff-appellant’s injury. In each case plaintiff-appellant attempted to obtain jurisdiction over the defendantappellee by virtue of provisions of Ark. Stat.Ann. § 27-2502:

“Bases of personal jurisdiction ovei persons outside this state.”

In interpreting the Arkansas statute, Judge Young found it inapplicable and accordingly quashed the service in both cases. Judge Young’s opinion is published in D.C., 259 F.Supp. 609. Because he has arrived at a permissible conclusion with reference to Arkansas law and a conclusion with which we are in complete accord, we affirm on the basis of his opinion as published.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Moore v. Little Giant Industries, Inc.
513 F. Supp. 1043 (D. Delaware, 1981)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
368 F.2d 230, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hill-v-morgan-power-apparatus-corp-ca8-1966.