Hill v. Morel
This text of 678 F. App'x 231 (Hill v. Morel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
■ This litigation arose because a transcript was not filed for the defendant. The defendant wanted to refile his Mississippi complaint in Arkansas, and he became the Plaintiff here against his former attorney and the court reporter.
This court agrees with the district court’s judgment that the allegations do not make a viable claim.
AFFIRMED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. '47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir, R. 47.5.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
678 F. App'x 231, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hill-v-morel-ca5-2017.