Hill v. Moore

5 N.C. 233
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided July 15, 1809·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

By the Court.

We are of opinion, that a posthumous child is entitled under our statutes of distributions to a distributive share; ánd that Mary Paris Moore was entitled to a share of Julius Moore’s estate equally with the brothers and sisters of saicl Julius, who were living at the time of his death and capable of taking.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hill v. Moore, 5 N.C. 233 (N.C. 1809).

5 N.C. 233 (Hill v. Moore) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Stam v. State
267 S.E.2d 335 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1980)