Hill v. Michom
5 Ohio Law. Abs. 76
This text of 5 Ohio Law. Abs. 76 (Hill v. Michom) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Hill v. Michom, 5 Ohio Law. Abs. 76 (Ohio 1927).
Opinion
Hill contends that a judgment of seventy-five dollars against him is erroneous and same should be quashed, because damages cannot be collected for wantonly killing a dog not listed for taxation.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
5 Ohio Law. Abs. 76, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hill-v-michom-ohio-1927.