Hill v. Metrospec, Inc.

730 So. 2d 218, 1999 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 124
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hill v. Metrospec, Inc.. Read the opinion of the Court — 1997 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 981
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama·Decided February 26, 1999·No. 2960793, 2960947·Published

Opinion

After Remand from the Supreme Court

THOMPSON, Judge.

In compliance with the opinion of the Supreme Court, Ex parte Hill, 730 So.2d 214 (Aa.1998), we set aside those portions of our earlier judgment affirming the summary judgment as to the plaintiffs’ claims alleging negligence, breach-of-contract, and negligent misrepresentation; and we set aside that portion of our earlier judgment directing further proceedings pursuant to the Aabama Litigation Accountability Act. To the extent our earlier judgment affirmed the summary judgment as to the plaintiffs’ other claims, the Supreme Court has affirmed that judgment.

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART; AND REMANDED.

ROBERTSON, P.J., and YATES, MONROE, and CRAWLEY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hill v. Metrospec, Inc., 730 So. 2d 218, 1999 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 124 (Ala. Ct. App. 1999).

730 So. 2d 218 (Hill v. Metrospec, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ex Parte Hill
730 So. 2d 214 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1998)