Hill v. Metrospec, Inc.

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Hill v. Metrospec, Inc.

730 So. 2d 218, 1999 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 124

CourtCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama

DecidedFebruary 26, 1999

Docket2960793, 2960947

StatusPublished

This text of 730 So. 2d 218 (Hill v. Metrospec, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hill v. Metrospec, Inc., 730 So. 2d 218, 1999 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 124 (Ala. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

After Remand from the Supreme Court

THOMPSON, Judge.

In compliance with the opinion of the Supreme Court, Ex parte Hill, 730 So.2d 214 (Aa.1998), we set aside those portions of our earlier judgment affirming the summary judgment as to the plaintiffs’ claims alleging negligence, breach-of-contract, and negligent misrepresentation; and we set aside that portion of our earlier judgment directing further proceedings pursuant to the Aabama Litigation Accountability Act. To the extent our earlier judgment affirmed the summary judgment as to the plaintiffs’ other claims, the Supreme Court has affirmed that judgment.

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART; AND REMANDED.

ROBERTSON, P.J., and YATES, MONROE, and CRAWLEY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

After Remand from the Supreme Court

THOMPSON, Judge.

In compliance with the opinion of the Supreme Court, Ex parte Hill, 730 So.2d 214 (Aa.1998), we set aside those portions of our earlier judgment affirming the summary judgment as to the plaintiffs’ claims alleging negligence, breach-of-contract, and negligent misrepresentation; and we set aside that portion of our earlier judgment directing further proceedings pursuant to the Aabama Litigation Accountability Act. To the extent our earlier judgment affirmed the summary judgment as to the plaintiffs’ other claims, the Supreme Court has affirmed that judgment.

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART; AND REMANDED.

ROBERTSON, P.J., and YATES, MONROE, and CRAWLEY, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

730 So. 2d 218, 1999 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 124, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hill-v-metrospec-inc-alacivapp-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack