Hill v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company

Alabama Court of Appeals

Hill v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company

96 So. 2d 184, 39 Ala. App. 39, 1957 Ala. App. LEXIS 131, 1957 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 71

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 12, 1957

Docket6 Div. 327

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 96 So. 2d 184 (Hill v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hill v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, 96 So. 2d 184, 39 Ala. App. 39, 1957 Ala. App. LEXIS 131, 1957 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 71 (Ala. Ct. App. 1957).

Pincite

Opinion

HARWOOD, Presiding Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the lower court in favor of the defendants below, who are the appellee here.

The facts' in this case are in all material aspects identical with the facts in the case of Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. v. Korneghy, 37 Ala.App. 497, 71 So.2d 292.

The doctrines enunciated in the Korneghy case, supra, are likewise decisive of this case if they are adhered to in this appeal.

Counsel for appellant strenuously argues that the conclusions reached in the Korneghy case are unsound, and they should be corrected by overruling that case.

We have reviewed the Korneghy case in light of appellant’s brief and arguments filed in the present case.

We are yet of the opinion that the conclusions and doctrines of the Korneghy case are correct as applied to the facts. It follows that they are likewise applicable to the facts of this case, and necessitate an affirmance of this judgment.

Therefore; on authority of the Korneghy case, supra, the judgment appealed from is ordered affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI