Hill v. McClendon

Ohio Supreme Court

Hill v. McClendon

745 N.E.2d 435, 91 Ohio St. 3d 1487, 2001 Ohio LEXIS 1020

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedApril 9, 2001

Docket01-635

StatusPublished

This text of 745 N.E.2d 435 (Hill v. McClendon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hill v. McClendon, 745 N.E.2d 435, 91 Ohio St. 3d 1487, 2001 Ohio LEXIS 1020 (Ohio 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

Cuyahoga App. No. 76871. Appellant filed a notice of appeal which states that this appeal involves a termination of parental rights. Upon review of the opinion of the court of appeals, it has been determined that this appeal does not involve a termination of parental rights. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the case shall not proceed under the expedited provisions for cases involving termination of parental rights or adoption of a minor child.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that appellees’ memorandum in response will be due no later than May 2, 2001.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cuyahoga App. No. 76871. Appellant filed a notice of appeal which states that this appeal involves a termination of parental rights. Upon review of the opinion of the court of appeals, it has been determined that this appeal does not involve a termination of parental rights. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the case shall not proceed under the expedited provisions for cases involving termination of parental rights or adoption of a minor child.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that appellees’ memorandum in response will be due no later than May 2, 2001.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

745 N.E.2d 435, 91 Ohio St. 3d 1487, 2001 Ohio LEXIS 1020, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hill-v-mcclendon-ohio-2001.