Hill v. Matthews

139 S.E. 822, 164 Ga. 880, 1927 Ga. LEXIS 300
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedOctober 1, 1927
DocketNo. 5679
StatusPublished

This text of 139 S.E. 822 (Hill v. Matthews) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hill v. Matthews, 139 S.E. 822, 164 Ga. 880, 1927 Ga. LEXIS 300 (Ga. 1927).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The petition in this case not plainly, distinctly, and fully setting out any case entitling the plaintiff to reformation of the deed in question, the court below did not err in sustaining a demurrer to the petition and in dismissing the same.

Reformation of Instruments, 34 Cyc. p. 971, n. 26.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Hill, J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
139 S.E. 822, 164 Ga. 880, 1927 Ga. LEXIS 300, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hill-v-matthews-ga-1927.