Hill v. Lundy

44 S.E. 830, 118 Ga. 93, 1903 Ga. LEXIS 460
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided May 30, 1903·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Candler, J.

1. It is not a proper ground of a motion for a new trial that the judge of the superior court, on the trial of an appeal from a county court, refused, on motion, to dismiss the appeal, or to dismiss the petition of one of the parties thereto. The error, if any, should he made the subject of a direct exception. Heery v. Burkhalter, 113 Ga. 1043, and cases cited.

2. The verdict was supported by the evidence, and it was not erroneous to overrule the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

By five Justices.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hill v. Lundy, 44 S.E. 830, 118 Ga. 93, 1903 Ga. LEXIS 460 (Ga. 1903).

44 S.E. 830 (Hill v. Lundy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Goodman v. Goodman
166 S.E. 261 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1932)