Hill v. Lundy

Supreme Court of Georgia

Hill v. Lundy

44 S.E. 830, 118 Ga. 93, 1903 Ga. LEXIS 460

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedMay 30, 1903

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 44 S.E. 830 (Hill v. Lundy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hill v. Lundy, 44 S.E. 830, 118 Ga. 93, 1903 Ga. LEXIS 460 (Ga. 1903).

Pincite

Opinion

Candler, J.

1. It is not a proper ground of a motion for a new trial that the judge of the superior court, on the trial of an appeal from a county court, refused, on motion, to dismiss the appeal, or to dismiss the petition of one of the parties thereto. The error, if any, should he made the subject of a direct exception. Heery v. Burkhalter, 113 Ga. 1043, and cases cited.

2. The verdict was supported by the evidence, and it was not erroneous to overrule the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

By five Justices.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI